Comprehensive assessment of proton plans with three different beam delivery systems for multiple brain metastases
Tara Gray, Anna Maria Kolano, Chieh-Wen Liu, Young-Bin Cho, Jeremy Donaghue, Samuel Chao, John Suh, Ping Xia and Jonathan Farr
Purpose: To compare plan quality among photon volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), Gamma Knife, and three different proton beam modalities.
Methods: Fifty-five brain lesions from 20 patients were planned with three different proton spot size ranges of cyclotron-generated proton beams, CPBs (spot size σ: 2.7–7.0 mm), linear accelerator proton beams, LPBs (σ: 2.9–5.5 mm), and linear accelerator proton minibeams, LPMBs (σ: 0.9–3.9 mm), with and without apertures and compared against photon VMAT and Gamma Knife plans. Dose coverage to each lesion for each proton and photon plan was set to 99% of the GTV receiving the prescription (Rx) dose. All proton plans used ±2 mm setup uncertainty and ±2% range uncertainty in robust evaluation to achieve V100%Rx > 95% of the GTV. Apertures were applied to proton beams irradiating tumors <1 cm3 volume and located <2.5 cm depth. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V12 Gy, V4.5 Gy, and mean brain dose were compared across all plan types. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was utilized to determine statistical significance of dosimetric results compared between photon and proton plans.
Results: When compared to CPB generated plans, average CI and GI were significantly better for the LPB and LPMB plans. Aperture-based IMPT plans showed improvement from Gamma Knife for all dosimetric metrics. Aperture-based IMPT plans also showed improvement in all dosimetric metrics for shallow tumors (d < 2.5 cm) when compared with non-aperture-based plans.
Conclusion: The LPB and LPMB stand as excellent alternatives to CPB or photon therapy and significantly increase the preservation of normal tissue.
Keywords: Stereotactic radiosurgery, minibeams, linear accelerator proton beams, apertures